![]() ![]() Given the different approaches each offers to file management and workflow, Capture is better for portable workflow or team integration (pro commercial and editorial work), whereas Lightroom is more suited to solo, retail shooters (headshots, weddings. #Iridient developer vs capture one skinIRIDIENT_X_TRANSFORMER_RECIPES_TEST - Google DriveĪt this stage I don't want to bias you with my findings and this is the reason I will not express any opinion. Capture has better color tools and handles skin nicely. I got the same file but only for ISO200/6400 and I applied various iridient x-transformer recipes, famous in fuji user community: You will find the test files for ISO 200/800/1600/3200/6400/12800 in the link below:Īnd some information about the settings used: Everything else is in default settings and with default color profiles. Trying to focus on the demosaicing part of post processing, I disabled sharpening, noise reduction and lens corrections. for processing X-Trans files in Capture One and Iridient Developer. RAW_EDITORS_FUJI_XT20_TEST - Google Drive photobob said: When I first got the Fujifilm X t2 I made and compared images. I got the RAF files from this dpreview test: ![]() Being an owner of an x-t20 and trying to find the best possible workflow quality wise, I decided to do some tests. ![]() I am new to the forum and new to the fuji family. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |